Print this page

Published: 22 September 2014

Lake Eyre Basin partnership wins 2014 Australian Riverprize


The International RiverFoundation has awarded the 2014 Australian Riverprize to a research-community-state partnership working to protect the natural values of the Lake Eyre Basin.

Water pours into Lake Eyre in 2009.
Water pours into Lake Eyre in 2009.
Credit: Jesse Allen, NASA

The Lake Eyre Basin is one of the last naturally free-flowing river basins in the world, occupying one-sixth of the Australian continent and spanning four states. According to the award judges, it supports diverse human communities and outstanding cultural and natural values.

The Lake Eyre Basin Partnership is made up of Natural Resource Management (NRM) groups from the four states included in the basin – Queensland, New South Wales, South Australia and the Northern Territory – along with scientists, community advisory groups and landholders.

Director of the Centre for Ecosystems Science at the University of New South Wales, Professor Richard Kingsford, is among those involved with the partnership, which received the award for successfully implementing two decades of river protection through extensive engagement, collaboration and action.

The award was presented during the recent International Riversymposium in Canberra.

Kate Andrew, who accepted the award on behalf of the partnership, said: ‘The Lake Eyre Basin Partnership demonstrates the importance of commitment to rivers as well as persistence. For people to have a passion and be able to sustain that for 20 years is a remarkable thing’.

Dr Deborah Nias, Chair of the Australian Riverprize judging panel, said: ‘The Lake Eyre Basin provides us with evidence that we can manage our Basins in a way that protects their future and gives hope to those who depend on them for their livelihoods and spiritual connections.’

‘The complexity of managing this vast, remote area demonstrates the importance of building relationships between government, the Indigenous people and other landholders and business.

‘The excellent science behind the Lake Eyre Basin shows the importance of quality research and monitoring, and the need for continued investment in research that will guide the management of the Basin in the future.’

The other finalists in the 2014 Australian Riverprize were Bannister Creek (WA), the Boorowa River (NSW) and Margaret River (WA) which was highly commended by the judges.

The win makes the Lake Eyre Basin partnership a finalist in the 2015 Thiess International Riverprize to be announced next year. The International RiverFoundation has just awarded the 2014 Thiess International Riverprize to Europe’s River Rhine.

The International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR) received the award for bringing Europe’s River Rhine back to life following a devastating chemical accident in 1986, which wiped out nearly all biological life. Prior to the accident, industrialisation and burgeoning populations had already caused major degradation to the river and, as early as the 1960s, the Rhine, which flows through six countries, was notoriously known as the ‘sewer of Europe’.

The restoration of the Rhine has taken the best part of a century, and involved extensive transboundary river management and cooperation.

Now, almost all of the 58 million inhabitants of the Rhine catchment are connected to urban wastewater treatment plants, water quality has improved considerably, and inventories show that fish species composition in the Rhine is almost back to what is was before the chemical spill.

Source: International RiverFoundation







Published: 4 July 2011

Assured sustainability reporting – navigating obligations

Nick Fleming

As the way in which organisations address environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues comes under increasing scrutiny, sustainability reporting is gathering importance and momentum. Yet reporting must be seen as a product of sustainable business practices, not the focus of it.

Emphasis on more robust sustainability reporting is helping to drive the wider assessment and reform of companies’ associated supply chains and logistics infrastructure.
Emphasis on more robust sustainability reporting is helping to drive the wider assessment and reform of companies’ associated supply chains and logistics infrastructure.
Credit: iStockphoto

While sustainability reporting is new territory for some organisations, many leading businesses have been engaged in reporting for over a decade. Indeed, sustainability reporting is typically one of the first vehicles for engagement with the topic and issues of sustainability, often at the encouragement of a few passionate staff.

However, the call for greater organisational accountability and transparency is growing. An increasing number of shareholder resolutions are placing pressure on company boards to ensure they are effectively identifying, disclosing and addressing ESG risks. Institutional investors are already using ESG data to differentiate firms and guide investment decisions.1

Powerful customers are also forcing their suppliers to become more transparent. The classic example is Walmart, which launched a supplier sustainability initiative in July 2009. Locally, Woolworths recently announced its own Sustainable Fish Sourcing Strategy.2

There is also an expectation for assurance. This reflects a stakeholder desire for reports to be relevant, reliable and free from bias, while the reporting organisation wishes to build a case for lower costs for finance and insurance. This all takes time and money; reporting can be a costly exercise and carries risks.

The banking sector provides an insight to the challenges posed by sustainability reporting. In Australia, banks have typically lead sustainability reporting and have performed well against international benchmarks such as the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Yet this year, the big four banks have been publically criticised over their involvement with coal-fired power stations.3 People ask how an organisation that receives sustainability accolades can also finance environmental pollution. This questions the connectivity between sustainability reporting and governance.

Scrutiny is also being applied by the regulators. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has prosecuted cases against companies such as GM Holden and Prime Carbon for overstating their ‘green’ credentials. It’s clear that inaccurate communication on ESG matters presents serious risks to an organisation’s reputation – and that of the rating or assurance agency.

These issues have been behind recent reviews of reporting guidelines and benchmarking methods.4,5 The reviews found that ratings and reporting tend to be backward-looking measures of compliance with ‘good practice’, failing to enable a meaningful assessment of an organisation’s ability to create and sustain value, in the short and longer term.

What’s lacking is adequate interrogation and reporting of the strategic capabilities and the core competencies required to underpin business continuity and delivery of sustainable outcomes; that is, a truly sustainable enterprise.

However, the push for integrated financial and non-financial (sustainability) reporting may offer a silver lining – the trigger to focus conversations among executives and boards about the things that will drive genuine business continuity, profitability and sustainability. Without these conversations, there will neither be the understanding, focus nor commitment to cultivate truly sustainable enterprises.

The adage ‘What gets measured gets managed’ remains true; as does ‘It’s what you do, not what you say, that counts’. Reporting without subsequent actions to manage risks and create value is meaningless, and arguably harmful.

While there are growing market and stakeholder pressures for integrated reporting of financial and ESG matters, reporting should only be entered into with an eye on:

  1. material business risks

  2. core competencies for organisational continuity

  3. a core set of meaningful performance measures that offer real insight

  4. integrating reporting into governance

  5. commitment to real action in response to identified risks and opportunities.

Organisations that assume this approach take sustainability reporting beyond a ‘nice?to?have’ PR exercise to a ‘must?have’ business improvement tool. It’s a factor in the superior financial performance demonstrated by ethical and sustainable organisations. Getting it right is good for business – and good for communities.

Dr Nick Fleming is Chief Sustainability Officer Sinclair Knight Merz, leading the application of sustainability thinking in business operations and client services. Through his Sustainable Enterprise column, Nick provides insight to how businesses and organisations are effectively putting sustainability theory into practice.


1 Ernst & Young (2011). Shareholders press boards on social and environmental risks. tinyurl.com/social-environmental-risks
2 tinyurl.com/sustainable-fish
3 Greenpeace (2011). Pillars of pollution. www.greenpeace.org.au/climate/GI-profundo.php
4 Eccles RG, Cheng B, Saltzman D (Eds) (2010). The landscape of integrated reporting: reflections and next steps. Harvard Business School. tinyurl.com/integrated-reporting
5 SustainAbility (2011). Rate the raters: uncovering best practices. www.sustainability.com/library/rate-the-raters-phase-one




ECOS Archive

Welcome to the ECOS Archive site which brings together 40 years of sustainability articles from 1974-2014.

For more recent ECOS articles visit the blog. You can also sign up to the email alert or RSS feed